Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Patrick Zahraj vs Bart Van Den Berg Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zahraj vs Berg analysis and find out who is favored!
Patrick Zahraj vs Bart Van Den Berg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zahraj 1 - 0 Berg
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zahraj has won 44.66% of points on their second serve, while Berg has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zahraj, in recent form, has won 53.74% of their opponent's second serve points, while Berg has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.36% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zahraj has saved 54.92% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Berg has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zahraj has won 61.43% of matches played (W/L 43/ 27), with Berg winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zahraj has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 11/ 8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 18/ 14). Berg has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 61/ 43), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Zahraj has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.32% of matches (W/L 43/ 26), where as Berg has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zahraj winning 1 times and Berg being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zahraj winning 2 and Berg winning 0. The last match between Zahraj and Berg was at the M15 Marburg, 10-07-2019, First, Clay with Patrick Zahraj getting the victory 6-3 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zahraj and Berg have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zahraj winning 0 times and Berg 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Zahraj winning 1, and Berg 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zahraj has played against opponents with an average rank of 125.99 while Berg has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zahraj has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Berg has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zahraj has converted 41.35% of breakpoint opportunities, and Berg has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
777
Rank
777
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
30
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
57% (85-63)
Career Total W/L
57% (85-65)
56% (15-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Patrick Zahraj | Bart Van Den Berg |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:0:0 | 2:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 78% (49/63) | 56% (56/100) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (36/49) | 61% (34/56) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 36% (5/14) | 45% (20/44) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 24% (4/17) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (46/100) | 35% (22/63) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Bart Van Den Berg
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Patrick Zahraj | Bart Van Den Berg |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (15/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (33/29) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (316/291) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 128 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.45 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 134 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:1 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 170.04 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1119/1861) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (760/1119) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (335/742) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (85/203) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (791/1872) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (15/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (15/27) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (14/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (14/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Patrick Zahraj Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Patrick Zahraj
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Patrick Zahraj
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Michele Ribecai
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
58 of
109)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
109)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Mariano Tammaro
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
94
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Patrick Zahraj
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Patrick Zahraj
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
12
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Matyas Cerny
69%
(
70 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
1
Aces
0
15
Double Faults
3
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
47 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Vincent Marysko
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Patrick Zahraj
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Arthur Nagel
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
5
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
5
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Bart Van Den Berg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
Player
Bart Van Den Berg
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
8
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julian Cash
Player
Bart Van Den Berg
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
40
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Uspensky
Player
Bart Van Den Berg
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bart Van Den Berg
Player
Ahmed Mounir
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
58%
(
21 of
36)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
Player
Bart Van Den Berg
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bart Van Den Berg
Player
Pierre Delage
58%
(
54 of
93)
1st Serve %
58%
(
73 of
125)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
56 of
125)
113
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Prevosto
Player
Bart Van Den Berg
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bart Van Den Berg
Player
Victor Ernaelsteen
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
42 of
87)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Bart Van Den Berg
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
1
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bart Van Den Berg
Player
Rayane Oumaouche
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
20 of
40)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Zahraj Vs Berg Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
